|
|
 |
|
Dean of
Clinical Sciences
Robert L. Irwin, D.C. |
Accreditation in the United States is a voluntary and
self-regulatory mechanism of the higher education community. It plays a
significant role in fostering public confidence in the educational
enterprise, in maintaining standards, in enhancing institutional
effectiveness, and in improving higher education.
(Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, Handbook for Reaffirmation
of Accreditation, 2nd ed., 2005, p. 1.)
Sherman College has embarked upon a very exciting project as part of the
college’s focused activities in preparation for reaffirmation of accreditation
with the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS). Accreditation
today, with federal calls for higher education accountability for student
learning outcomes and consumer protection, depends upon the institution’s
ability to demonstrate its commitment to student learning outcomes and
continuous quality improvement.
In order to demonstrate these ideals, SACS requires its member institutions to
submit a Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) as part of the reaffirmation process.
The QEP is a focused plan that describes a specific course of action with
established performance objectives that the college will implement and measure
progress toward in order to demonstrate improved student learning outcomes. The
topic can be anything the college community considers essential to transform the
learning environment.
In September 2005, the Institutional Effectiveness Committee solicited QEP
topics from the various college constituency groups including college
committees, department heads, faculty, faculty department heads, student
government (leadership and class cohorts), individual students and
administrators.
The committee reviewed and categorized ideas that would satisfy SACS’ QEP
requirements. The committee then narrowed the viable ideas to three and
appointed an ad-hoc discussion group consisting of faculty and students to
further develop the ideas in order to present them to the Faculty Senate for
final selection.
The discussion group completed its work, and in February 2006, the faculty chose
the Performance Enhancement Modules as the QEP the college would pursue.
Executive Vice President/Provost Myron Brown, D.C., then appointed the QEP
Development Team and charged the team to development the plan according to SACS
criteria.
Faculty team members include the following:
-
Sheldon Clayton, Ph.D. professor, basic sciences
-
Joseph Donofrio, D.C., associate professor, clinical
sciences and chairman, technique department
-
Tim Guest D.C., associate professor, clinical sciences
-
Beth McDowell, D.C., assistant professor, clinical
sciences and coordinator, Clinical Proficiency Examination
-
Reneé Prenitzer, D.C., assistant professor, clinical
sciences
-
Claudia, Seay, D.C., associate professor, clinical
sciences, lead faculty doctor and coordinator, Clinic Entrance Examination
-
Arlene Welch, D.C., instructor, clinical sciences
Student team members include the following:
-
Amilliah Kenya, 11th-quarter student
-
Landin Marzolf, 9th-quarter student
-
Mary Strange, 9th-quarter student
Administrative team members include the following:
-
Myron Brown, D.C., executive vice president/provost
(ex-officio)
-
Robert Irwin, D.C., dean of clinical sciences (committee
chairman)
-
Timothy Revels, vice president for business and finance
The QEP Development
Team meets on a weekly basis, and its early focus has been the discussion of the
wide-range of learning opportunities that could be available within performance
enhancement module pedagogy.
Ultimately, the team expects to develop a comprehensive plan that will transform
student learning and facilitate students’ application of acquired knowledge into
competent performance that is critical to their success as students and their
success as future doctors of chiropractic. Team members are researching best
practices and storyboarding ideas that have been demonstrated to accomplish this
type of learning objective.
Throughout the next year, the team plans keep the college community informed
about QEP status through a dedicated Intranet page that includes information and
meeting minutes accessible to campus stakeholders. The team will also post “QEP
Bulletin” announcements in the café and submit periodic college newsletter
feature articles.
The QEP will be completed and submitted to SACS in early February 2007. A SACS
on-site review committee will visit the campus April 10-12, 2007, to review the
plan, provide consultative feedback and recommend (to SACS) whether it is a
satisfactory and relevant means by which the college will improve student
learning.
|